Yes, as my learned colleague above said I’m not a mod in this section.
I just know bs when I see it.
I suppose you also think the moon landings never happened?
OOooo....sarcasm 
Well done!
Can't believe you sheeple believe in the moon - NASA LIES
why should I, my credentials back me up 
Did any of you both even check out my suggestions. They are all true and verifiable, conspiracy facts not theories Try to keep up and learn the difference //static.avforums.com/styles/avf/smilies/facepalm.gif.
Interesting you mention the moon landings, the old lob everything in together to discredit card, why not bring up 911 and JFK as well, check my posts, I never have 
Can you summarise cable 06 etc. Just so I know what it refers to?
While the nearly seven-year-long sectarian “civil war” in Syria is widely believed to have started in 2011, revelations in recent years have shown that the sectarian war that has sunk Syria into chaos actually precedes the “official” start of the conflict.
In 2010, Wikileaks published hundreds of thousands of classified State Department cables, including a 2006 cable showing that destabilizing the Syrian government was a primary goal of U.S. policy in the Middle East. The ultimate intention was to topple Iran, one of Syria’s closest allies. The cable revealed that the U.S.’ goal at the time was to undermine the Syrian government by any means available.
Or BS as @Greg Hook would have you believe 
Edit : would love to hear your views on it, as the silence from everyone else is deafening 
I already know the cable content ... wasn't exactly surprising, but the conclusions you draw are not objective facts.
Pretty much the same for PNAC.
And you already know my incredulous stance on your boogeyman Soros.
No, that sounds very plausible. Of course there are always many ideas and strategies banded around. But supporting the rebels is exactly what we did. And that would have happened way before we officially got involved, as it could then be said we had a duty to support the "good guys".
I remember Cameron even saying he knew which were the good rebels and we had to support them! Of course out of it came Islamic State and the videos of atrocities kind of gave us a clue that there was something wrong with the plan.
Unfortunately, many in the Western agencies and government's just don' t understand the middle east.
* not sure what this has to do with the OP
It's a deflection, usual response.