Different interview ?
Either he picked her due to their past or he picked her as so many were resigning from his shadow cabinet at the time. Neither suggests her suitability to run the home office.
The net result is not the same. May will be reliant on Corbyn to agree to some of her policies when slender majority afforded by the coalition of chaos is eliminated by rebellions and whittled down by wastage. During periods of this Parliament, Corbyn will find himself in an influential position. That is far removed from Labour in the 1987 or 1992 Parliaments.
the phrase "as i understand it"implies something else but I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt and not jump on the let's have a go at her bandwagon.At least Jezza was willing to cut her some slack which speaks volumes for his character
That reads better 
This should have been a landslide victory for May, start of the year Conservatives were hugely favourable and she managed to fudged it up.
She some how managed to make the media's hated man become a strong leader in the end, the irony was that May was never as strong as she presented herself.
Yes she should go!
Think she lost the plot when she avoided the tv debates, can't be any logical reason to miss those out.
And she ducked out of those gigs, supposedly to meet people on the doorstep, but of course had the time for the One Show to talk about who puts the bins out, and that hard hitting ITV interrogation where the nation was rocked by the scandal of her running through wheat fields when she was a child.
I find it odd that she deems that naughtier than trying to ruin the country, she's a strange old bird.
^^^ iirc it was John Oliver who called her The Thatcher in the Rye earlier this week
- should be in this report (or CLICKY if embedding disallowed) ...
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1241307629331577