View: 727|Reply: 7

Lovelock says we are already too late

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:28:39 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
BBC News - Today - Lovelock: 'We can't save the planet'

Pretty depressing read to be honest. I have read most of Lovelock's books and think he is a genius.
Reply

Use magic Report

26-11-2019 04:28:40 Mobile | Show all posts
He always was a bit of a fruit cake, but interesting nonetheless.

At least being an old school scientist, he's not happy with the garbage that's being done in science's name these days.

From a recent Guardian interview with him: [On the subject of the leaked CRU 'climategate' emails:]

On the influence of vested interests:

Continued:

James Lovelock on the value of sceptics and why Copenhagen was doomed | Environment | guardian.co.uk
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 04:28:41 Mobile | Show all posts
Have you read Gaia: a new look at life on Earth? Its a really good book.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:28:41 Mobile | Show all posts
I have a lot of time for Lovelock. His Gaia idea has been widely misunderstood as some kind of new-age mysticism, when in fact it’s simply an acknowledgement that life, the oceans, the land and the atmosphere are all part of one big interactive whole. He originally emphasised the stabilising effects, but now realises it can get out of control, too.

I think he wishes now he’d thought up some less evocative name.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 04:28:42 Mobile | Show all posts
Yeah I know. I totally agree.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

26-11-2019 04:28:42 Mobile | Show all posts
No I haven't. Although I've read books that are influenced by his ideas like the Foundation series by Isaac Asimov.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:28:42 Mobile | Show all posts
I don't follow that.

Foundation preceded Gaia by a quarter of a century.

And anyway I'm not sure I see the connection. Foundation's psychohistory describes purely human societies; a kind of quantified mob psychology. Gaia disregards human activity per se; its original idea was to try and demonstrate a self-correcting process within the Earth's inter-connected physical systems. Psychohistory couldn't cope with the unforeseen (the Mule), whereas Gaia is a mechanism specifically hypothesised to counter it.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

26-11-2019 04:28:42 Mobile | Show all posts
The 4th and 5th books in the series, Foundation's Edge (1982) and Foundation and Earth (1984) talk about Gaia. It's ages since I've read them & I've not read the prequel yet either.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部