Author: Jezza99

Stop Funding Hate

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 02:38:37 Mobile | Show all posts
Then I'd suggest stopping thinking, you don't seem too good at it.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 02:38:37 Mobile | Show all posts
For the third time, I'm saying there's a difference between investing in ISAs and pensions, that are fully sanctioned by the government, and exploiting loopholes to avoid tax and/or claim extra benefits. There's absolutely no hypocrisy involved in seeing a difference in two things that are entirely different. That they are both legal has no bearing on them being different.

As @KiLLiNG-TiME quoted

Tax avoidance is bending the rules of the tax system to gain a tax advantage that Parliament never intended," said a spokesman for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

How do you see that as being the same as an ISA or pension investment?
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 02:38:37 Mobile | Show all posts
So £4bn   £5.1bn = £35bn.   Who knew. Or is there another category apart from tax avoidance and evasion that makes up the tax gap?

Probably best that you do "duck out".
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 02:38:37 Mobile | Show all posts
Well in the absence of any cogent argument from yourself, It's difficult to avoid.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 02:38:38 Mobile | Show all posts
£4bn   £5bn = roughly a quarter of the £35bn. Exactly as quoted in your reply. Try reading before jumping down someone's throat

See above, thinking and comprehension are a little lacking in your eagerness to belittle others.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 02:38:38 Mobile | Show all posts
@KiLLiNG-TiME has already admitted he doesn't understand the difference between avoidance and evasion, so he's probably not the best person to be quoting. However , HMRC are obviously an interested party in the issue of tax collection, so hardly an unbiased source to quote. Their definition (if it's that as quoted), does not meet the legal definition I'm afraid. It reeks of sour grapes boo-hoo we've been outmaneuvered and there's nothing we can do about it.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 02:38:38 Mobile | Show all posts
Exactly as my post. The "tax gap" is comprised of tax evasion and perhaps tax avoidance. So what is the mysterious 75% shortfall here?

See above. You would be the expert in lacking comprehension.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 02:38:38 Mobile | Show all posts
This might explain the claim and conclusion:

Tax: evasion and avoidance in the UK

So there is an error in the claim of £34 billion lost. The missing bit is due to uncollected taxes.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 02:38:39 Mobile | Show all posts
No mystery, it's all there in the link from the post you quoted. As I said, try reading things properly before jumping down someone's throat. Again
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部