View: 25|Reply: 0

only marginally better than "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes"

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
17-2-2021 09:49:06 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
I saw the original in 1960 and it was a piece of fluff even for back then. What I can't understand is who would want to remake a bad movie, except, perhaps, if your goal was to end the collective careers of everyone in the cast.  All the actors were a little long in the tooth for the roles they played.  Lisa Hartman Black looked like she may have been a professor at Heidi Fleiss University but a 21 - 22 year old co-ed?  I don't think so. This movie was so awful, I felt embarrassed for the actors.  Come to think of it, it did effectively serve as a career-ender for several of them.  On the whole, I think it's only marginally better than the "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes," which is generally believed to be THE worst movie of all time.

score /10

Kcuaron 2 May 2003

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw0216903/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部