Next general election - who to vote for

BobbyMac

I'm not trying to suggest whether he is or not, I was just trying to ask why you were asking another member to accept he isn't.

IronGiant

Because it would be hypocritical IMO to not even countenance voting labour because of an issue that other parties suffer from (or similar)

However if someone thought JC was AS, then it’s not as weak a reason as I’m suggesting

Also I’m wasn’t asking another member to accept he isnt AS, I was asking their opinion

I’m not sure where the confusion or issue is coming from tbh, however if you’d like to explain or elaborate, I’m all ears

rustybin

It was this comment, you appear to be asking BG to accept that Jeremy Corbyn isn't anti-Semitic.  I'm not sure whether the "personally" applies to JC or BG.    If  misconstrued, please put me right

Trollslayer

Conservatives, so long as May or similar is in charge. Otherwise I have no idea at all. Maybe Labour just so I get a proper payrise in the short term.

BobbyMac

Actually I was talking about smaller roadworks.

Rasczak

Next general election - who to vote for

I was asking BG, see the link above posted earlier

IronGiant

Its all much of a muchness. Its not really a political point - roads would be underfunded whoever is in power - but saying "life is great because you are seeing lots of roadworks" is just a bit misplaced IMHO.

EarthRod

I'm still confused, sorry, so you were asking BG to accept that JC isn't anti-Semitic?  

What if JC is anti-Semitic, would you accept that?

Rasczak

Ha!

You've asked a question, then made a judgement based on a non-existent answer.

Why not ask the question, wait for an answer - then base a judgement on that.

IronGiant

If we are going to be nit-picky on posts, actually what Bobbymac did was to ask a binary question and then provide his analysis if one of the two answers was given. This is often a good way of posting as it progresses the discussion along the direction of the most likely and reasonable response plus, in this case, stops the respondent having to disclose a personal opinion that might be libellous if they choose the other path.