View: 28|Reply: 0

2/10 stars for 2/10 parts of the story you should have given us

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
30-11-2019 05:02:07 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
Such a shame. You can see that a movie is technically very well made, camera is top notch, acting is excellent, pacing is slow, but steady. It has a lot of things going for it.

But the movie feels like someone watched 'No Country for Old Men' and thought "This, but instead of giving the audience a story with no meaningful resolution, let's not give them a meaningful story at all". I mean, it's ok to leave out story parts and let the audience fill in the blanks, but you ripped out practically the entire story to the point that the movie no longer has a plot.

I can't recommend this movie to anyone, except as an exercise in frustration. I've let Coen brothers get away with this in 'No Country for Old Men', but Jeremy Saulnier, you didn't earn that right yet.

score 2/10

laserburn 29 September 2018

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw4368160/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部